The Traditional View of Love as Fulfillment of Absence
For centuries, love has been understood as the pursuit of what is missing. From Plato’s Symposium to modern romantic ideals, love is often framed as a longing for something absent, an attempt to complete oneself through the other. This idea, deeply embedded in Western thought, has shaped how people seek, experience, and suffer through love. It has fueled countless stories, myths, and philosophies that portray love as a journey of desire, struggle, and fulfillment.
At the heart of this view is the notion that love arises from a deficiency, from an emptiness that seeks to be filled. Socrates, through Diotima’s discourse in Symposium, presents love (eros) as the child of Poverty and Resourcefulness—a state of lack that compels one to reach for completion. Love, in this view, is always directed toward something it does not yet possess, a striving for beauty, truth, or unity. Whether in romantic longing, the attachment to family, the bond of friendship, or even the yearning for divine connection, love is often seen as a movement toward something external. This understanding, while deeply influential, rests on the assumption that beings are incomplete and that fulfillment lies outside oneself.
Love and the Contradiction of Becoming
This conception of love, however, rests on an implicit contradiction. If love is the pursuit of what one lacks, then it presupposes a fundamental instability in being—an ongoing movement from deficiency to fulfillment. But such movement assumes that being is not fully itself at any moment, that it is always in a state of becoming. This is the same contradiction that underlies all nihilistic thought: the belief that reality is not yet what it must be, that existence is a process rather than an eternal necessity.
Emanuele Severino’s critique of becoming reveals why this view of love is ultimately illusory. If Being is eternal and necessary, then there is no true absence—only the appearance of absence within a framework that misinterprets necessity as contingency. Love, understood as the fulfillment of lack, is a product of this misinterpretation, a way of conceiving reality that presupposes deficiency where there is none. In this light, traditional notions of love are not descriptions of an essential truth but symptoms of a deeper misunderstanding of being itself.
Love as the Recognition of What Is
If love is not the pursuit of what is missing, then what is its true nature? To answer this, one must first recognize that nothing is ever truly lacking. Being, in its totality, does not change, diminish, or seek completion. The love that appears within human experience is not the striving for something absent but the recognition of what is eternally present. Love is not movement toward unity; it is the unveiling of unity that already is.
This shift in perspective transforms the way love is understood. Rather than a desire to possess, conquer, or complete, love is the joyful recognition of necessity—the recognition that the other is not an object of need but an eternal presence that has never been absent. Love, in all its forms—romantic, familial, friendship, and divine—is not about attaining what is missing but about seeing what is already given. Where the traditional view breeds anxiety, attachment, and the fear of loss, the recognition of love as necessity dissolves these fears, revealing that nothing essential can ever be lost.
Toward a New Understanding of Love
By moving beyond the idea of love as the fulfillment of absence, we open the way to an entirely different experience of love—one that is not rooted in becoming but in Being itself. Love, rather than an effort to complete oneself, becomes the direct perception of completeness. It is not a striving but an awakening, not an attainment but a realization.
This perspective lays the foundation for exploring the deeper nature of love, contrasting it with desire, and understanding how its misunderstanding contributes to human suffering—topics that will unfold in the following articles.

Leave a comment