Polarity is woven into the fabric of reality. From the forces governing the cosmos to the tiniest particles in physics, the universe operates through the tension and balance between opposites. One of the most fundamental and enduring polarities is that of male and female. This polarity isn’t just a social or cultural construct—it reflects a deeper metaphysical structure intrinsic to Being itself.
In both nature and metaphysics, polarity is an expression of unity through differentiation. Physics offers a compelling example: particles and antiparticles, positive and negative charges, magnetic poles—all are defined by their relationship to one another. Biology, too, reflects this structure. Male and female roles in reproduction are not arbitrary but essential for the continuation of species. On a human level, the polarity of male and female manifests not only biologically but psychologically and socially, shaping our identities and relationships.
From a metaphysical perspective, as explored by Emanuele Severino, Being itself is eternal and necessary, rejecting change or becoming. Polarity within this framework is not division but a necessary mode of appearance—two distinct expressions within the unity of Being. The differentiation between male and female reflects the structure of Being as it appears in the world, where difference does not imply opposition but complementarity.
The male and female polarity should not be mistaken for hierarchy or opposition in terms of value or worth. Rather, it is about the interplay of distinct roles and expressions that, together, articulate the fullness of Being. The existence of difference within unity is crucial—it ensures the perpetuation and unfolding of reality without implying change or becoming.
This polarity also permeates social and psychological dimensions. Carl Jung’s concept of anima and animus—the feminine and masculine aspects within the psyche—echoes this metaphysical structure, showing how polarity exists not just between individuals but within each person. Recognizing this polarity within ourselves and others is essential for understanding the structure of Being as a whole.
As we move forward in this series, we’ll explore how modernity’s challenge to traditional gender roles disrupts this fundamental structure and how the crisis of identity we experience today signals a deeper metaphysical shift.
Polarity as a Fundamental Structure of Being
In the eternal structure of reality, polarity is not a contingent feature but an essential mode of differentiation within unity. The male-female polarity is not an arbitrary social construct but a necessary expression of Being’s appearing. Even beyond living beings, polarity manifests in fundamental aspects of existence. Physics reveals the necessity of complementary forces—positive and negative charges, expansion and contraction, energy and structure. These are not mere metaphors for gender but indications that differentiation within unity is a fundamental pattern of Being.
In the biological world, sexual reproduction is not an accidental mechanism but the structured unfolding of polarity. The differentiation of male and female allows for the continuity of life, yet it also reveals something deeper: the interplay of distinct yet complementary expressions of Being. This is not merely a physical necessity but a metaphysical truth—existence does not unfold as uniformity but through structured differentiation.
The male-female polarity, then, is not a division but a relational dynamic. Each exists not as an isolated entity but as part of a necessary whole. This does not mean that individuals must conform to rigid roles but that the polarity itself expresses an eternal structure. To deny this polarity is to deny differentiation itself, which is to deny the necessary unfolding of Being.
The Crisis of Gender and the Nihilistic Paradigm
Historically, gender roles were seen as fixed and assigned based on function and hierarchy. While these roles varied across cultures, the recognition of male and female as distinct yet interdependent was nearly universal. However, the contemporary crisis of identity signals a deeper movement: the recognition that gender is not merely biological but also a fundamental mode of being.
Modernity, however, has misunderstood this recognition. Instead of seeing gender as an essential polarity that manifests in different ways, it has concluded that because gender roles were socially constructed, gender itself is arbitrary. This is the contradiction inherent in becoming—the illusion that by deconstructing past formulations, one has erased necessity.
The rise of gender fluidity, the rejection of binary distinctions, and the increasing detachment of identity from biological reality all stem from the nihilistic paradigm. In a world where nothing is seen as necessary, identity itself becomes fluid, subject to the whims of individual perception. But this rejection of polarity does not lead to liberation; it leads to fragmentation. The loss of structured differentiation results in existential confusion, as individuals search for meaning in a framework that denies the very necessity they seek.
This crisis is not accidental but an inevitable consequence of the unfolding of nihilism. When Being is mistaken for becoming, every structure is seen as contingent, every differentiation as oppressive, every identity as arbitrary. But this paradigm cannot sustain itself indefinitely. The contradictions within it ensure its collapse.
Beyond the Crisis: The Unfolding Recognition of Necessity
The dissolution of traditional gender roles was not an error but a necessary stage in the unveiling of truth. The rigid imposition of roles based solely on function obscured the deeper metaphysical necessity of polarity. The crisis of gender, though rooted in nihilism, forces a confrontation with the deeper question: what is essential about male and female beyond social constructs?
The answer lies in recognizing that gender is not simply a biological or social category but an expression of the necessary differentiation within Being. The male-female polarity is not reducible to traditional roles, nor is it something that can be arbitrarily reconstructed. It is a mode of appearing that reveals the fundamental interplay of unity and distinction.
As the nihilistic paradigm collapses under the weight of its own contradictions, a new recognition will emerge. The rejection of gender polarity will give way to the understanding that differentiation does not mean division, and necessity does not mean oppression. This recognition will not be a return to rigid structures of the past but a deeper unveiling of the eternal truth that polarity is intrinsic to Being.
The future of identity lies not in erasing distinctions but in seeing them clearly. The dissolution of traditional gender roles has opened the space for this recognition, and the eventual realization will not be a return to the past but an entry into the deeper truth of differentiation within unity. The crisis, then, is not an endpoint but a passage—one that leads beyond contradiction and into the necessary appearing of Being.
It Is What It Is 
Leave a comment