Among the world’s religious traditions, it is often the mystical branches that come closest to touching the eternal. Stripped of ritual obligations, institutional boundaries, and political frameworks, the mystical path tends to turn inward, toward contemplation, inward transformation, and a direct encounter with what it names as the divine. Often expressed in metaphors of light, union, annihilation, and return, the mystical way is a perennial current flowing through diverse civilizations, appearing in Neoplatonism, Kabbalah, and Sufism, among others.
And yet, even here, where the veils are thinner and the intuitions sharper, the vision of Being remains partially obscured. For the mystic, the divine is often conceived as the origin from which all things flow and to which all must return. This cosmological movement, this arc from emanation to reintegration, still presupposes a beginning, a path, a distance, and a final reunion. It is precisely this structure, so beautiful in its imagery, yet bound to the language of time, that keeps even the deepest insights from clearly recognizing the eternal identity of what is.
Still, we must proceed not with critique, but with gratitude. These mystical paths do not err because they are blind, but because the seeing they open has not yet fully emerged from the horizon of becoming. Their metaphors shine with proximity to truth, even when their frameworks hesitate before the impossible clarity of necessity.
Neoplatonism: The Return to the One
In Neoplatonism, particularly as expressed in Plotinus, the soul is seen as emanating from the One, the utterly simple, transcendent source of all that is. From the One proceeds the Nous (Divine Intellect), and from the Nous, the World Soul. Individual souls, having descended into the material world, forget their divine origin. The mystical journey is thus a re-ascent, a turning back, a purification of multiplicity so that the soul may return to union with the ineffable source.
Here, the language is strikingly beautiful. The soul does not grasp the One through reason or effort, but through contemplation, silence, and inwardness. Union is not achieved by force but by becoming “like” the One, by shedding what is not essential until the soul, in its simplicity, mirrors its origin.
But this path of return, however inward and non-linear, still assumes a distance. The One is that from which the soul has come and to which it must go. It is, therefore, still positioned at the end of a process, a culmination that lies ahead. Even if this movement is described as timeless or beyond time, it remains structured as a progression; from multiplicity to unity, from forgetfulness to remembrance, from exile to home.
The truth of Being, however, is not something to which one returns. It is not that from which anything has departed. The soul, in its essence, is not on a journey toward identity; it is identity. It has not fallen from unity into multiplicity; what appears as multiplicity is already within the necessity of what is. There is no true distance from the One, because Being, in its eternal structure, does not admit of absence.
And yet, Neoplatonism intuits a great truth: that what we are cannot be fulfilled by knowledge alone, nor by power, nor even by the multiplicity of goods. It sees that what is most real is not what is most complex, but what is most simple and indivisible. And it reaches, again and again, toward the recognition that what is cannot have come into being; though it does not always see the full consequence of that insight.
Kabbalah: Emanation, Concealment, and the Infinite
The Jewish mystical tradition of Kabbalah also speaks in metaphors of light and return. From the ungraspable Ein Sof, the infinite, emanate the ten sephirot, the divine attributes or vessels through which creation unfolds. The world exists in a state of partial rupture, exile, or concealment (tzimtzum), in which the divine has withdrawn itself to allow for otherness. The task of humanity is to repair this fragmentation through tikkun, the spiritual and ethical restoration of unity.
In Kabbalah, the soul descends into the world through successive layers of embodiment, and its journey is one of remembrance and ascent, culminating in reintegration with the divine source. The afterlife is often imagined as the soul’s return to the divine light, where its identity is preserved yet transformed, like a drop returning to the ocean, yet never fully losing its form.
This language of emanation and return, like that of Neoplatonism, powerfully gestures toward the insight that the world is not separate from the divine but is its unfolding. It speaks of fragmentation, not as illusion, but as the appearance of the whole under the condition of time. Yet even here, the central structure remains temporal: there is a fall and a restoration, a path and a goal, a return that is not yet completed.
But the structure of Being allows no room for divine withdrawal. What is cannot step back. The eternal does not create a space for the temporal, what appears does not emerge from a void, nor does it proceed toward fullness. Every being is already whole, already necessary, already eternal. There is no exile, only the appearance of exile. No return, only the recognition of what never left.
Yet Kabbalah’s intuition of Ein Sof, of a reality utterly beyond conceptual grasp, is a powerful witness to the fact that Being cannot be reduced to a category. Its metaphors may veil necessity in the language of process, but they also remind us that the fullness of reality is not conceptual, not manipulable, and not contingent.
Sufism: Love, Annihilation, and Union
In Sufism, the mystical dimension of Islam, the path is one of love, remembrance (dhikr), and annihilation of the self (fanā’). The soul journeys through stages and stations, purifying itself of illusion and ego, until nothing remains but the Real (al-Ḥaqq). The Sufi does not seek reward, nor even paradise, but the presence of God; an encounter in which the self vanishes, and only divine being remains.
The language of Sufism is often lyrical, ecstatic, and paradoxical. God is both hidden and nearer than the jugular vein. The world is both illusion (māsiwā Allāh) and the place where the Real is witnessed. The beloved is both other and self. Love, for the Sufi, is not a path to possession, but a fire that consumes all separation.
Here, the veiling is the thinnest. The idea that what must be annihilated is not the body or even the mind, but the illusion of separateness, comes remarkably close to the unveiling of the eternal structure of Being. When Rūmī says, “You were never hidden from me, except in my belief,” he speaks the logic of necessity without quite naming it.
And yet, the notion of fanā’, of the self ceasing to exist so that only God remains, still carries the echo of becoming. The idea that something must cease in order for the Real to appear implies a change, a before and after. The truth, however, is not that the self must be annihilated to reach God, but that the self, as what-is, is already within God; not by fusion or transformation, but by necessity.
The mystical insight is thus both deep and partial. It sees through the illusion of separation, but often still speaks of union as the goal. But union implies two becoming one, when in truth, there has only ever been one. There is no merger, no fusion; only the eternal coexistence of the many within the uncontradictable truth of what-is.
The Necessity Behind the Metaphor
Across these traditions, the mystical impulse is a testimony to the fact that the world’s surface cannot satisfy the heart of being. The mystic is not content with moral codes, institutional truths, or distant promises. They seek presence. And that seeking, even when veiled in metaphor, is already a witness to the structure of Being.
But metaphor cannot be the foundation. The truth of Being is not a mystery to be approached, but a necessity to be recognized. The eternal structure does not unfold, does not emanate, does not hide; it simply is. And everything that appears, appears within this necessity, not as a step toward it.
Still, these traditions remain profound witnesses to that necessity, precisely because they show the limits of language. In reaching beyond doctrine, they affirm what lies beyond words, even if they have not yet seen that what lies beyond is not absent, not silent, and not to come. It is here. Now. Always.
And this intuition is not confined to Neoplatonism, Kabbalah, and Sufism. Christian mysticism, in voices like Meister Eckhart or Dionysius the Areopagite, longs for union beyond image and concept. Hindu Advaita Vedānta names the Self as already identical with the Absolute, though often in metaphors of realization. Buddhist Dzogchen and Zen speak of an awareness that neither arises nor ceases. Taoist mysticism, through the Tao, gestures toward what cannot be named, yet always is. In each case, the eternal is approached, but often still clothed in the language of return, of path, of unveiling.
What they gesture toward remains the same: the necessity of what-is, the impossibility of absence, the truth that Being neither begins nor ends. Their metaphors may veil it, but their longing reveals it.
It Is What It Is 
Leave a comment